Posted: Oct 10, 2019 1:53 am
I didn’t “pretend” that you hadn’t written a detailed list of anatomical traits of female afarensis. Those were irrelevant to the issue of whether that particular sculpture, made by a sculptor you showed little respect for and for a modelling industry you and others discounted, was intended as a female.
It's surprising to find myself writing this, but it has to be said that this is one of the most stupid things I've ever seen you write.
Did you even think this through before writing it?
The gymnastics you've elected to contort yourself through to avoid acknowledging your error is at parody level.
How do you even convince yourself of this bullshit, let alone write it publicly?
How can the cranial morphological traits of female afarensis be irrelevant to the sex of a replica afarensis skull?
Seriously, what the fuck are you talking about?
As for the strike-through - pure fiction on your part. You need to stop lying. You pretend you're so hard done by and that everyone else is so terrible to you, but you endlessly bullshit about people here trying desperately to disparage them on grounds that literally never occurred.