Posted: Nov 17, 2019 3:18 pm
Wortfish wrote:...
Sorry. But my little bit of editing does not change the fact that there is huge confusion on this issue:
http://nsdl.niscair.res.in/jspui/bitstr ... pology.pdf
What are you "Sorry." for? How will you make restoration for your lie? Your lie means that you will not be believed again until long after the restoration of your credibility.
Take a look below. These are consecutive paragraphs in the same article:1. Humans are primates, and the first members of the human species were probably more similar to living nonhuman primates than to any other animals on earth. Thus, by studying living primates we can learn something about the lives of our ancestors.
2. Humans are closely related to primates and similar to them in many ways. If we understand how evolution has shaped the behavior of animals so much like ourselves, we may have greater insights about the way evolution has shaped our own behavior and the behavior of our ancestors.
How can humans be primates AND be closely related to primates?
I "took a look" a while back and agree with felltoearth's reply above. Now, you have multiple lies to deal with. I'll wait...