Posted: Nov 18, 2019 11:09 am
True, I have repeated my arguments many times but then so have you, maybe more obsessively than I.
The difference, of course, being that I have provided numerous sources establishing the validity of my arguments, whereas yours remain just declarations.
Yes, I said that, and you elided it - typical, this is exactly how you keep ignoring all those sources contradicting your assertions.
For example, you replied to my latest post with 14 of your own, and no one else has so far.
And that's a non-sequitur.
That I posted 14 times doesn't mean I have repeated the same arguments.
Why do you try these transparent scams, JJ?
And those posts include many personal insults.
You mean when I pointed out that you lied?
You can take that as an insult if you want, but then the way to stop it from occurring in the future is to STOP LYING.
I feel that by repeating arguments in slightly different ways, I am adapting closer to the essentials of how atheist ideology has messed up human origin stories.
He says repeating the same argument he's declared 500 times while never offering a shred of evidence in support of it.
And I have some faith in the common sense of skeptics that some will pick up that some of what I’m saying might be true. But I don’t expect a miracle.
If they believe what you're saying is true, then they're obviously not actually skeptics. The legitimate sources in credible scientific journals saying the exact opposite with reference to material evidence should be more than ample to tip off even a would-be skeptic... but those with a little more nous couldn't help but notice how you have singularly failed to support any of your claims, yet have repeated them for 200 pages. No actual skeptic buys into the Goebbels Doctrine, JJ.