Posted: Jul 25, 2010 11:52 am
Steve,
At this point I am motivated to ask a simple question, which hopefully you can answer with a simple response.
What evidence would it take to convince you that the ToE explains the biodiversity found throughout the biosphere?
If there is nothing we can do to convince you that the overwhelming evidence gathered over the past 300 years fully supports a naturalistic explanation for this biodiversity what is the point of continued conversation?
Steve, do you really want to be seen as one so inflexible in your position that NOTHING, including an Everest size mountain of hard evidence, can convince you that your views are incorrect?
RS
At this point I am motivated to ask a simple question, which hopefully you can answer with a simple response.
What evidence would it take to convince you that the ToE explains the biodiversity found throughout the biosphere?
If there is nothing we can do to convince you that the overwhelming evidence gathered over the past 300 years fully supports a naturalistic explanation for this biodiversity what is the point of continued conversation?
Steve, do you really want to be seen as one so inflexible in your position that NOTHING, including an Everest size mountain of hard evidence, can convince you that your views are incorrect?
RS