Posted: Jul 28, 2010 12:18 pm
by Animavore
Atheistoclast wrote:
Their assumption is there must be one, even if the evidence is antithetical to this belief.

Examples of "antithetical" evidence please.

Atheistoclast wrote:
This is absolutely cretinous piece of obfuscation. Design inferences work because there is no naturalistic explanation

Correct. Your point?

Atheistoclast wrote:A rock placed on a beach by a human could have also have been deposited by natural forces.

Except the rock in question was designed and shaped by a man, not just placed there. That sort of went over your head, didn't it?

Atheistoclast wrote:There is a big difference between what Nature can do and what she cannot.

Talk about stating the obvious.