Posted: Jul 28, 2010 4:46 pm
I'm amused by some of his points on the site:
Yes because Calli really spouts indoctrinated answers about Siamese Fighting Fish which he has bred. Furthermore, I doubt I'm spouting indoctrinated answers when I refer to skeletal data.
I think it was the fact he boasted about several patents and then when people tried to find what he had, they found nothing that may have been a problem. With this in mind, it is easy for people to claim what they don't have on the net. I could claim I have a PhD and a lectureship in Human Osteology, however, that would be lying. Also, I have noted in another thread that Stevebee apparently considers other people's education as important argumental points. Therefore, scrutinising his own claims and not relying upon authority is giving him the same treatment as he gives others.
From here
So if he's not religious; how come he believes in a creator? How come he labels himself as not an atheist or agnostic? Therefore, he must be a follower or acknowledge some supernatural deity, making him religious.
Pot Kettle Black. I remember chihuahua turds...
So refer to scientific, peer-reviewed papers by professionals in the field who have better credentials that Stephen is a sign of indoctrination? This is the most illogical bullshit I've seen for ages!
(2) When your answers are memorized dogma. Stuff that someone who taught you in school who doesn’t know, or a book you read written by a person who has no idea how nature came to be but nonetheless has fooled you into thinking they do. One great example is that I ask the question about how bio-systems, such as a hepatic system, which had to evolve in a single species, migrated from the original species to all of the other species that then and now have livers. I usually get this answer: “Traits” change and those changes are caused by mutations, and are passed from generation to generation. Additional changes occur, and eventually, through tiny steps over millions of years……..” The writers obviously have no idea about the difference between “traits” which are items such as eye color, height, weight, hair color, and “biological systems”, which includes items such as hepatic systems, vision, auditory systems, musculo-skeletel,….. The evo-responders are on auto pilot. They just spout the answer, because that is what they were taught. There is no thought as to whether the question is answered or not. Push the button, out comes the indoctrination. And this is common beyond my wildest expectations. Intelligent people who must know the difference between “traits” and “biological” systems write as if they don’t.
Yes because Calli really spouts indoctrinated answers about Siamese Fighting Fish which he has bred. Furthermore, I doubt I'm spouting indoctrinated answers when I refer to skeletal data.
(3) I pose a question, and instead of answering you choose to demean my education, which is extensive, my knowledge about evolution, which is also extensive, (remember, I was an evolutionaut, and an enthusiastic one at that) my IQ, my upbringing….you say ANYTHING but answer the question posed.
I think it was the fact he boasted about several patents and then when people tried to find what he had, they found nothing that may have been a problem. With this in mind, it is easy for people to claim what they don't have on the net. I could claim I have a PhD and a lectureship in Human Osteology, however, that would be lying. Also, I have noted in another thread that Stevebee apparently considers other people's education as important argumental points. Therefore, scrutinising his own claims and not relying upon authority is giving him the same treatment as he gives others.
(4) You play the religion card. Again, I am not religious. You bring up “the magic man in the sky”, “sky fairies”, anything to distract from the question you are showing you can’t answer.
I am not an atheist or agnostic. I believe in an incredibly intelligent Source or Creator, but my beliefs go no further. I have no idea who, where, or what that source really is.
From here
So if he's not religious; how come he believes in a creator? How come he labels himself as not an atheist or agnostic? Therefore, he must be a follower or acknowledge some supernatural deity, making him religious.
(5) You call me dumb names. I have already been called everything you can think of and more. IDiot, fuckwit, moron, retard, Creotard. Again, by doing this you are avoiding answering a question you can’t deal with. So this is the way you choose to distract from the question. It simply shows indoctrination.
Pot Kettle Black. I remember chihuahua turds...
(6) You refer me to another site, book, or video, made by someone who you worship and think knows all of the answers. They don’t. And if you believe they do, you are indoctrinated. You have fallen, just like I did.
So refer to scientific, peer-reviewed papers by professionals in the field who have better credentials that Stephen is a sign of indoctrination? This is the most illogical bullshit I've seen for ages!