Posted: Aug 01, 2010 10:38 pm
Atheistoclast wrote:I find Calilasseia's attempts to suggest that design is a trial & error process most amusing.
I find it amusing that you're once again trying to deny the reality that is staring you in the face. What part of "those failed rockets demonstrate that trial and error is present in human design" do you not understand?
Atheistoclast wrote:Bad designs fail because not enough thought and intelligence went into them.
The Shuttle wasn't a "bad design" for the first 24 of its missions. Plus, given the amount of thought and intelligence that went into the Shuttle, I think the NASA engineers would like a word with you about your above assertion.
FAIL.
Atheistoclast wrote:In software engineering, we have a term called "design for test".
And how much of this have you done again?