Posted: Aug 10, 2010 8:47 pm
stevebee92653 wrote:Re:Oh my... did little Stevie get offended?
Sorry guys, I'm not offended in the least. I'm completely used to the ragging of course.
The martyr syndrome is strong in this one.
stevebee92653 wrote: Means nothing to me.
Of course not. Is that why you wrote that other whining post here, and the one about abuse and indoctrination on your blog?
stevebee92653 wrote:That's the way you play the game. Intelligent discussion takes two, and your choice is not to discuss,
Fantasist horseshite. How about you start answering the many questions and rebuttals you have recieved in this very thread?
You could start here: http://www.rationalskepticism.org/creationism/remember-stevebee-t9281-220.html#p371643
And go on from my post, including the posts from several others that follow. So much for not participating in intelligent discussion... you have yet to actually discuss.
All we have are your horseshit blind assertions, our rebuttals and then no answers from you. Not much discussion going on on your part.
stevebee92653 wrote:which could be very interesting for both, but to continually rag on me. No melt down here. Sorry.You're wasting your effort.
In some ways I know I am. I know that you personally have decided to propagandize for doctrine, will not change your mind and will never admit to it. The only reason I persist in refuting your fantasist horshit and lies is for the off chance that someone might think answers don't exist for your ludicrous assertions and misrepresentations.
stevebee92653 wrote:Don't you get tired or writing the same stuff over and over?
No. I never tire from demonstrating what is true or explaining it to people who would like to know about it. You can't make me stop or go away.
stevebee92653 wrote:Since my last entry:
When ideas are idiotic they deserve to get called it.
all you ever do is talk out of your ass
Much of your bullshit has been explained and debunked in this very thread
your ideas is intellectually dishonest.
I love the smell of melt-down in the morning
Martyr complex, get over it.
I would get tired writing this kind of feedback. Why are you here. Why waste your time? I don't get it.
As I just explained, I like to inform people of the truth. I like it when I know there are people out there who benefit from the efforts me and others invest in this. Indeed I myself learned most of what I now know of evolutionary biology from reading the many very well written rebuttals to Intelligent Design/Creationist bullshit assertions on the old Richarddawkins.net forums. I like to imagine that I'm in some small way returning that favor.
stevebee92653 wrote:Take this to a math instructor. Forget about what have to say. It's simple math:
Given: 2 people, bulldozers, rocks, anything, at point A
8 billion bulldozers, rocks, people, anything at point B, 200,000 years later.
How many doublings occur, and what is the AVERAGE time span for each doubling of the quantity of people, bulldozers, rocks, anything.
Again, the number 2 is used for SIMPLICITY, which you have so much trouble with. Use a larger number if you like. 2 is best for YOU. You HAVE TO REACH 8 billion, so the food, disease, whatever doesn't matter. You MUST reach 8 billion. That is GIVEN.
Doesn't matter what the entities are. Everything is FIXED. I'm sure you won't spend a second getting a math answer. It goes against your belief system, and you have to play pretend and ignore the question. So, I really think your best ploy here is to demean some more. Don't do an honest search. I can't wait for the "answers".
There are roughly 33 doublings from 2 to 8 billion.
Though, last I heard, the lowest number of living humans in our distant history could have been as low as 10.000 people. There are roughly 20 doublings from 10.000 to 8 billion. What's your point?
PS. What is it I need a math instructor for?