Posted: Aug 28, 2010 5:18 am
by mark1961
stevebee92653 wrote:I am sure you guys can rag on me just fine without my presence.
You win on sheer volume. Cali's thousands of peer reviewed papers, and his evolving goldfish did the trick.
I have officially been debunked, as the thread name implies.
Funny that none of you were able to address the original vid on ISP.
I understand fully though. It's not answerable, so you HAVE TO rag on and on as a good cover-up. It's NOT your fault. Don't blame yourselves! It's the fault of your fake science, and that is what you need to blame. So, carry on, study hard. Keep up the good work.
Adios


Does the format or timing of an argument actually change it's meaning. Not as such but as I said before this method gives people time to think about what's said and listen to other's responses as well. Which is the real reason why you failed.

TTFN :)