rationalskepticism.org

I find it interesting that Raleigh used Discovery Institute hacks as evidence of peer reviewed intelligent design propenents. These same Discovery Institute hacks who refused to defend the viability of intelligent design in court during the Dover v Kitzmiller trial. They stand atop their high horse wailing that BIG SCIENCE keeps their ideas out of mainstream science, yet when they had the chance to defend their position in a court case which sought to establish whether intelligent design was scientific in nature, they refused to testify. They left it up to Behe to defend their nonsense and this garnered the result of Behe having to accept that any definition that would permit ID as being science would also have to include astrology. They are incompetent beyond belief.