Posted: Oct 17, 2010 11:12 am
by Shrunk
Rumraket wrote:
halucigenia wrote:
Rumraket wrote:It's a lot of work to do, and this is by his intention.
But if we cut through the crap and actually tell him why he is wrong... Is that not worth trying?

That depends on what you want to achieve. If you think you can convince SteveBee, then no it's not worth it. He's dead-set on his worldview. If merely to show that we can show how or why he's wrong, to a 3rd person, then sure.

One other piece of advice, halucigenia, if you wish to continue this quixotic quest: There's no point in trying to inform Steve about details and evidence of evolutionary theory, because his problem is much more basic than that: He does not know how to think logically. Just look at his posts in the Human Population for Dummmies thread. Therein, he goes on for pages making this argument: "X is theoretically impossible. Empirical evidence demonstrates that X did not, in fact happen. This is an amazing paradox that defies explanation. Therefore, evolution is a lie."

Good luck arguing with someone who thinks like that.