Posted: Oct 17, 2010 11:12 am
Rumraket wrote:
That depends on what you want to achieve. If you think you can convince SteveBee, then no it's not worth it. He's dead-set on his worldview. If merely to show that we can show how or why he's wrong, to a 3rd person, then sure.
One other piece of advice, halucigenia, if you wish to continue this quixotic quest: There's no point in trying to inform Steve about details and evidence of evolutionary theory, because his problem is much more basic than that: He does not know how to think logically. Just look at his posts in the Human Population for Dummmies thread. Therein, he goes on for pages making this argument: "X is theoretically impossible. Empirical evidence demonstrates that X did not, in fact happen. This is an amazing paradox that defies explanation. Therefore, evolution is a lie."
Good luck arguing with someone who thinks like that.