rationalskepticism.org

stevebee92653 wrote:

Paul wrote:I find it hard to take seriously anyone who uses the word "invent" so often when trying to rubbish evolution

stevebee92653 wrote: Want REAL WORLD? NOTHING has NEVER been observed initiating inventing and assembling anything, nor in the steps of doing so, by any human who ever lived on the face of the earth. Not now, not ever. THAT is REAL WORLD.

stevebee92653 wrote:If these organisms “survive quite happily” then why did species go to the unimaginable lengths to invent, design, assemble, sustain bio-systems and organs through evolutionary processes?

stevebee92653 wrote: so they could invent, assemble, and figure out the dynamics of bio-systems?

Anyone who has truly studied evolution, whether they accept it or not, knows that at no point does anyone who accepts evolution assert that any species invented any adaptations.

It's wrong and it seems to me like a wilful misrepresentation of evolution, rather that rational discourse.

Ah. The reason you don't "assert" invention is because you can't explain it. Simple as that. I don't blame you either. It's your best strategy.

Huh? The reason evolution doesn't assert "invention" is that there is no evidence or even reason to suspect "invention".
That's a pathetic strawman argument, and I now have even more reason not to take anything you write seriously.

By the way, I don't have a strategy, I'm not even an expert on evolution. I haven't formally studied any biology since 1974.
I'm more of an interested observer in these threads. When it comes to the detail of evolution, DNA, genetics etc. I leave it to the experts.

I'm probably the sort of person you should be targeting with your claims. However the bullshit in your posts always sticks out like a gigantic sore thumb. When I see things so obviously wrong and unsupported as some of the stuff you argue, then it doesn't encourage me to give anything you say any credence.