Posted: Dec 22, 2010 5:30 pm
Darwinsbulldog wrote:Oh well, I just glanced at the paper without much enthusiasm anyway. By Behe's standards, it is relatively objective!
A couple initial thoughts of my own:
Behe's paper is a useful tool with which to bitch slap any creationists who trot out the "no beneficial mutations" canard, since here is a paper by one of their own admitting that they exist.
I also wonder if Behe can provide any observed examples, under natural conditions, of his claimed mechanism of beneficial mutations being inserted into a genome by an "intelligent designer"?