Posted: Mar 05, 2011 12:44 pm
In case anyone who thinks they are countering what I wrote didn't read this the first time round, I'll repeat it:
"That's why I don't look for evidence against evolution. Why? Because I believe in evolution. But I see lots of evidence that casts doubt on the prevailing neo-Darwinian orthodoxy."
I never said that the quotes I gave were evidence against evolution. I just want people to look at the facts that are emerging and ask themselves, "In what way is the neo-Darwinian explanation having to be adjusted to accommodate the facts? If there are no doubts in your mind then what can I say? You're just as much a fundamentalist as we find amongst young earth creationists.
When I get the time I'll give a longer response to some of the points brought up, but there's a lot to go through.
Regards,
CharlieM
"That's why I don't look for evidence against evolution. Why? Because I believe in evolution. But I see lots of evidence that casts doubt on the prevailing neo-Darwinian orthodoxy."
I never said that the quotes I gave were evidence against evolution. I just want people to look at the facts that are emerging and ask themselves, "In what way is the neo-Darwinian explanation having to be adjusted to accommodate the facts? If there are no doubts in your mind then what can I say? You're just as much a fundamentalist as we find amongst young earth creationists.
When I get the time I'll give a longer response to some of the points brought up, but there's a lot to go through.
Regards,
CharlieM