Posted: May 19, 2011 12:17 am
by willhud9
byofrcs wrote:The problem with Dawkins' use of the evolution of the eye and the creationists use of design is that no one can tell the difference between a design that has been evolved and a design that has been created manually.

If you assume a designer with super-powers of design and a long process of evolution then there should be no difference; that's the problem of all of this - people make a claim of a "designer" but they are unable to show how you can tell the difference.

That is too assume that they have a "design" in the first place. Does the eye have a design because it was created with one or does it have a design because we assume it has one? I say the latter.