Posted: Nov 07, 2011 12:39 am
Weaver wrote:So you're not actually going to answer his (Sovereign's) question, then?
If you want to just put up more links, you don't have to quote irrelevant questions from other posters - especially when the links you post don't even support the points YOU are making in your posts.
Edited to make attribution clear.
it is answered. Structuralism is part of the creationist hit list on traditional evolution. It shows at least this time, they are more clued up and ahead than the rest of the game.
bit strange that, but like i said, its over simplistic and not in keeping with how reality works to expect every breakthrough to come from where you expect it.