Posted: Nov 07, 2011 2:16 pm
You did not answer my question Brain Man. You did some dance around it completely. I don't care about an ad homenim Meyers threw out. I asked what testable theories have the alt science people produced? It's kinda like those armchair fighters who say Anderson Silva is over rated because he doesn't fight in a traditional way regardless of the fact he had beaten everyone he has fought. When you ask them what style they practice, they don't.
Now on to the structuralism. I read the Science Daily articles and could you please explain to me how those articles disprove evolution and proves intelligent design? My reading comprehension must be really bad because I couldn't find it. If anything, they're more evidence for a common ancestor through evolutionary means.
All I ever see ID people do is scream "You don't fully understand that so God did it!" and when they are shown to be wrong, they keep screaming the same thing over and over again as in the case of Casey Luskin and the bacteria flagellum. If you're theories are so strong, give me one that can be tested via observation or experimentation.
Now on to the structuralism. I read the Science Daily articles and could you please explain to me how those articles disprove evolution and proves intelligent design? My reading comprehension must be really bad because I couldn't find it. If anything, they're more evidence for a common ancestor through evolutionary means.
All I ever see ID people do is scream "You don't fully understand that so God did it!" and when they are shown to be wrong, they keep screaming the same thing over and over again as in the case of Casey Luskin and the bacteria flagellum. If you're theories are so strong, give me one that can be tested via observation or experimentation.