Posted: Apr 09, 2010 10:25 pm
Anyone interested in my verisimilitude in the claim I make on the pace and nature of the discoveries listed in these posts can start dealing with that by looking at the following conversation. It's a continuation of a mathematics-reference-desk conversation. You won't be able to sort it out very much, but it stands as a kind of evidence. You might also learn some mathematics on a low level. Please do not disturb the person concerned. He's pretty busy. My talk page--which I have chosen to use in a way as my user page--says some stuff too, not all number stuff either.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_Talk: ... Discovered
Here is one of the little coincidences--a connection of two re-discoveries. 82818079...321 is prime and 82000 is probably the only non-trivial number that uses only the digits 0 and 1 in bases 3 to 5. If you go to the link, you will see that I just received a message in regards to the first.
The following thread started out differently, but records pretty much all of the discoveries I have been and will be talking about. It is also the first public conversation thread I ever created AND the thread number is one off in one digit from being my 7-digit phone number. We can work out the closest thing to physical evidence of something or other that I can provide through this medium at a later date (i.e., someone like Calilasseia can call me). I'm currently identified as Eveneye--Eegogee--Julzes. My home space there is hopelessly out of date in tone if not detail, but of course you can read it if you want.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/dna/h2g2/brunel/F1 ... ad=6922123
The following thread is an alternative source for many of my coincidences and says some other interesting things (by me and others). I would suggest going in reverse order rather than reading the whole thread or trying to find my first post there based upon a poor guess of September for when I first showed up on it.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/dna/h2g2/brunel/F1 ... ead=369071
Since this last one's thread number is a little of a reminder (just the 71), my next post will deal with my accepted prime curios at the first site I mentioned in this sequence. I may make it the last one dealing with numbers other than 365 (That is, I will put everything else I can come up with in it, and there is a bit more). By the way, ever since I mentioned that Obama got 365 electoral votes (not the 'projected' 349 at that number's curio), my curios have been constantly rejected. I can't assume that's the or the only reason, but without an e-mail explanation I can guess that it might have been important.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_Talk: ... Discovered
Here is one of the little coincidences--a connection of two re-discoveries. 82818079...321 is prime and 82000 is probably the only non-trivial number that uses only the digits 0 and 1 in bases 3 to 5. If you go to the link, you will see that I just received a message in regards to the first.
The following thread started out differently, but records pretty much all of the discoveries I have been and will be talking about. It is also the first public conversation thread I ever created AND the thread number is one off in one digit from being my 7-digit phone number. We can work out the closest thing to physical evidence of something or other that I can provide through this medium at a later date (i.e., someone like Calilasseia can call me). I'm currently identified as Eveneye--Eegogee--Julzes. My home space there is hopelessly out of date in tone if not detail, but of course you can read it if you want.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/dna/h2g2/brunel/F1 ... ad=6922123
The following thread is an alternative source for many of my coincidences and says some other interesting things (by me and others). I would suggest going in reverse order rather than reading the whole thread or trying to find my first post there based upon a poor guess of September for when I first showed up on it.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/dna/h2g2/brunel/F1 ... ead=369071
Since this last one's thread number is a little of a reminder (just the 71), my next post will deal with my accepted prime curios at the first site I mentioned in this sequence. I may make it the last one dealing with numbers other than 365 (That is, I will put everything else I can come up with in it, and there is a bit more). By the way, ever since I mentioned that Obama got 365 electoral votes (not the 'projected' 349 at that number's curio), my curios have been constantly rejected. I can't assume that's the or the only reason, but without an e-mail explanation I can guess that it might have been important.