Posted: Feb 24, 2012 8:12 pm
Hay Skeptics!
No time to write but EW said it about as good as I could to keep this simple and the discovery on top of the table.
Hi John, (and others)
I saw your blog regarding CERN's neutrino speed and thought you'd want to know calculations using Stanford's SLAC E158 data on the asymmetry of the weak force were posted by amateur physicist John F. Hendry on Nature's Forum after the CERN September announcement showing each step taken in adding the weak force asymmetry time/space gained in 453.6 miles explaining CERN's v-c/c=2.58e5 neutrino speed. This “added space” is the breakthrough that physics (and Einstein) sorely needed but for Hendry and his friends in the music field the data correlation was not an accidental discovery and the breakthrough happened years ago. Stanford’s SLAC E158 team’s data causing this measurable gain was announced by Hendry years before CERN’s “impossible announcement” and is the reason his response using SLAC’s “unrelated” E158 data was immediate.
The information showing CERN's neutrino v-c/c=2.58e5 @ 453.6 mile gain is a product of weak force asymmetry was posted years ago using SLAC’s E158 data to correct the slight error detected in Newton’s law and went unnoticed outside the music tech community. After CERN’s announcement Mr. Hendry showed the asymmetry value of the weak force applied to E=mc2 (as well as F=ma) which unlike Newton’s Law had no reported error outside of his own claim until CERN showed its effect happening. It’s posted on several other science related forums as well found by Googling "John Hendry neutrino". Mr. Hendry’s claim is also supported by the quantum mechanical behavior of evanescent modes. As you may already know, frustrated total internal reflection (FTIR) using double prisms has clearly revealed quantum mechanical tunneling and “virtual particles” are needed for describing interaction processes where “imaginary” and “not really real” virtual photons predicted by QED calculations are used to fill in the gaps created. This “added space/time” is real and the “imaginary” mathematical placement holding term being used to hold time has been replaced by a real and measurable additional phase in time needed to transfer energy not understood by physics until Real Relativity Theory which the top sound techs had no problem accepting since it “made sense” of time. UFT research grew into DNA research and later resulted in a New Circle of Fifths (while working on the DNA’s gene ensemble’s “circle”) where tonal space is placed relative to time, AND a second phase or direction of time (replacing imaginary time and numbers) relative to Mass oscillation is added to show phase and allow all the sharp and flat notes to fit into the wheel in correct order. This second inertial frame based phase direction towards ‘home’ gives gravity dominance as the initial state force and shows force moving from a higher pressure well to a lower, whereas electron flow is opposite despite common sense with most conventional texts reversing it in the direction of the lower pressure well due to it’s reverse phase direction. Hendry’s E=m+{a}c2 based model is derived from an algebraic particle wave (time) producing clock equation powered by the weak force’s reverse quantum gravity phase separating quantum gravity from cosmological gravity by it’s opposite anti-particle phase and the neutrino’s added space. The equation is built out of known symmetries rearranged by a mechanical function of phase with the needed asymmetry properly placed to transfer E and is exceptionally simple once you realize when Mass oscillates it does the “Moon Dance” to move forward, and due to time dilation the matter in the universe exists in a state of almost frozen time @3.6 seconds a year dilation from looking at Mass in oscillation creating a speed of light clock running slightly fast. It’s initially as controversial as it gets because the UFT equation adds the graviton as a 4th phase/part to the atom and demonstrates that space itself is the force carrier of non-quantum gravity we observe, and Mass is its own force carrier of quantum gravity. When the anti-graviton’s “hole” oscillation phase is active (E returning), the electron’s oscillation (atomic) phase is going up (E doing work and dissipating) with the weak force separated from the strong force by the weak force’s asymmetry neutrino space transferring the photon’s energy at the speed of light adding that tiny distance that adds up with time as shown in other experiments as well.
In 1949 Sommerfeld pointed out that the FTIR tunneling optical phenomenon represents the analogy of quantum mechanical tunneling and in 2007 armed with modern measurements the August New Scientist quoted G. Nimtz and A. A. Stahlhofen as saying that this barrier is crossed in zero time at superluminal tunneling velocity and therefore the evanescent modes of tunneling are disobeying Einstein’s special theory of relativity, or “lie outside the bounds of STR”. They demonstrated this by showing the photons of a light beam crossing the open prisms or “tunnel” did not add the required time needed to cover this “magic” distance at the speed of light. Here, as with CERN’s neutrino speed, we see the laws of relativity again being “broken” without accounting for the weak force asymmetry time gained. Unfortunately you will also see Hendry’s research time and money over the past 12 years has been consumed by a criminal case involving an HOA lawsuit instead of building his home and workshop needed to conduct his own experiments. You can’t hide public records and it’s about time something was done about HOA’s beyond Court gag orders to hide the truth of what goes on with these “legal entities” so hopefully this discovery will draw attention to what stopped the research of the only person to come forward who understands the need and function of the neutrino and the space/time associated with photonic tunneling. The Esaki diode (semiconductor tunnel) has been in use since 1962 but the particle barrier penetration time was not yet determined nor explained outside of “parasitic time consuming electronic interaction effects in a semiconductor”. Now the barrier time is known thanks to SLAC’s E158 team of experts showing in 453.6 miles 2.48e-5 (CERN’s same result) is added to the speed of light with a .20 comma as predicted by Hendry as well as part of Cohan and Glasgow’s VSR theory.
Adding the WFA gain to Mass oscillating at the speed of light (a speed of light clock) reveals constant time dilation as well as asymmetry is added and in effect “at normal walking speed” due to observing the weak force running fast (SOL-SOL=WFASY gain). Hendry is pointing out that we are observing a speed of light clock (creating anti-particle Mass oscillation phase locations) from another frame of reference where our clock has not stopped completely due to the added time. So anti-particle Mass oscillation formation phases are short lived, and the space created is replaced by mass potential energy and the particle wave point space/field created remains permanent building up with time. Isometry, like rests in a music composition, is in effect between observers showing no two observers are simultaneous connecting E to observation by giving the observer Mass. CERN’s neutrino speed is showing we live in a Universe constructed of time dilation where we only observe 3.6 seconds tic by each year. The addition of the neutrino’s space needed to transfer the photons energy has added time to a physical Universe in the direction of the arrow of time with so little movement the trail of an atom’s particle phases (wave) leaves a solid impression shown real by it’s 4 phases of force in phase with the atom’s formation (and the photon), and on the other side/direction of Mass oscillation where quantum gravity’s return reverse arrow cannot grow longer but the clock phase keeps spinning adding gravity a black hole forms with both sides interacting in perpetual interlocking phases of force placing the Observer in the middle feeling the effect. I don’t think the HOA attorneys that robbed Hendry after a 9 year legal battle will obtain the usual silence they expect if SLAC’s E158 data matches CERN’s data because E=m+{a}c2. Surprisingly no one has commented on or disputed Hendry’s addition to mathematics (Einstein’s Comma) on Nature’s forum, certainly the place to do so with CERN workers posting their comments and math to correct CERN’s “error” before Hendry’s announcement, especially since the tiny asymmetry value of the weak force matches CERN’s data against such incredibly high odds of chance and creates a new cosmological constant of obvious effect that Hendry uses to build a model of the 4 Mass oscillating (weak force) particle phases of force creating time as well as holding atoms together, which are not what they appear to be and wave theory explains why.
Unless they decide to try to keep Hendry’s discovery top secret which will be hard to do with the cat out of the bag making so much noise the requirement for the experts needed to announce the shocking data correlation is to not look less informed than an amateur and the wait to catch up and understand the matching data (as well as quantum tunneling) is creating a silence with zero press coverage of the discovery of Hendry’s work that revealed the CERN neutrino/SLAC E158 data relationship. The math is straight forward and Hendry has been citing the cause of the weak force asymmetry and importance of the photon/neutrino energy transfer space using SLAC’s E158 data for years. Fortunately CERN handed Hendry a worldwide press event in physics of the highest caliber of importance based on a simple straight line and known value discrepancy to prove E=m+{a}c2) as well as F=m+{a}a making 2.48e-5 a very important number to remember by its match with SLAC’s E158 data. It’s now probably the most important number in the history of Physics. To grasp this just imagine how far in distance light travels in one thousand years…..now add the relatively small but still vast distance compared to 453.6 miles that light travels in one hour to the thousand year speed of light distance. Now calculate using Hendry’s calculations posted the weak force asymmetry distance gained in 453.6 miles and you have 2.48e-5 showing CERN’s neutrino gain in v is an exact match with Stanford’s SLAC E158 weak force asymmetry t gain creating a .20e-5 harmonic wave comma showing a greater value of 2.68e-5 in the measured asymmetry of a second reverse arrow (anti-graviton phase) of space exactly as Hendry’s theory predicted producing further evidence neutrinos oscillate and Hendry’s claim is correct and accurate. It also supports elements of Cohan and Glasgow’s VSR showing space has a slight measurable asymmetry at this scale just as they claim. Hendry’s addition and confinement of Mass within the weak force connects the Observer to the Universe of forces as a critical part: Mass. Plain and simple, on and off, John Hendry has shown Mass and the point of observation (force) are one and the same on the quantum scale and the weight of Mass, it’s potential energy to oscillate, determines the length of oscillation and explains exactly what time is while exposing the Mass based nature of consciousness and goes far past VSR’s errors.
Due to Stanford's SLAC team's E158 discovery of the weak force asymmetry using a 1000 year speed of light clock measurement to add the one hour asymmetry time gained it has an accuracy advantage over CERN’s data based on only 453.6 miles and places CERN’s data responsible for the final figure responsible for what Hendry named “Einstein’s Comma” in correcting E=mc2. This is not a lose cable as ABC announced recently after Hendry’s data circulated for almost 4 months undisputed by scientists and comments using the math only supported Hendry’s finding. The odds of both CERN and SLAC’s sets of data reaching the same exact "error" in 453.6 miles (2.48e-5) within CERN’s stated limit of error without the direct relationship Hendry pointed out is highly, highly unlikely, and to produce the predicted harmonic oscillation comma correctly shows how accurate both sets of data are and makes it obvious Hendry’s prediction over the years is responsible when you consider he knew exactly what data to use to show cause and effect and we are seeing with neutrinos @ v-c/c=2.48e5 in need of explanation that SLAC’s data matches exactly within CERN’s limit of error.
This relationship stated for years came about by needing the weak force asymmetry value revealed to Hendry by an equation he (and others) claim is the real deal fit on a t-shirt UFT equation of 4 forces working together to create the first atom out of time/energy he posted online years ago before finding SLAC’s E158 data to fill in the needed gap with Google caching saving some of its history. The UFT equation’s track record is impressive if it is answering the biggest question brought forward in physics yet. And this is only one event that has left a track record such as this. Hendry claims (without dispute again and with 100% agreement from those that have seen it awaiting potential patenting issues beyond copyright law) he created a New Circle of Fifths while working on the DNA’s Gene Ensemble’s Summery trying to “cheat” by copying the math over using it. If so that is something impossible to fake as it’s the spine of harmonic music theory. Hendry states assigning tonal space to time made room for all the key signatures to fit and be included in the motion of real time. He says the incomplete original Circle of Fifths worked because it has always relied on the proper Mass oscillation phase cycle of the graviton called the “hole” found opposite the electron in modern books on electricity of imaginary nature except to those in the field that argue which one is moving, the electron or the hole. Stanford’s SLAC E158 team’s data has inadvertently confirmed Hendry’s claims made in the years gone by as well as CERN’s neutrino speed through simple math anyone with a calculator can do revealing the relationship in the three prier unrelated sets of data answering the past questions of quantum tunneling . If Hendry is correct space is the force carrier of gravity. It’s as if the graviton (or “hole” named for a reason) is the spaced formed when you put your finger (the anti-electron’s mass) into clay and create space the size of your finger as you pull it out. No space outside of space is a strange concept till you add time and Mass to see how they go together.
This indeed changes physics by someone who is not a mathematician but in needing to communicate is introducing a new system of mathematics replacing “imaginary time” and the “imaginary” concept used with a second (real) reverse clock phase of Mass oscillation time representing a second reverse arrow of space. The experts seeing Hendry’s posts were silenced claiming CERN in error not expecting such a finding related to the weak force and I think when this gets around the laymen not worried about their “expert” reputation will get it out when Hendry posts the new standard model. I think politics are choking this discovery. Even if it was a coincidence we should have heard something about it when you consider the tremendous distance light travels in a thousand years verse one hour ratio and then section out only 453.6 miles to add the tiny asymmetry value of the weak force to it. At these odds against chance it’s the topic of the Century. Add all the support for Hendry’s correction from 1949 when Sommerfeld pointed out that the FTIR tunneling optical phenomenon represents the analogy of quantum mechanical tunneling to 2007 with G. Nimtz and A. A. Stahlhofen’s data supporting many other measurement claims of the Goos-Hanchen shift that also suggests that tunneling beams travel with superluminal group velocity showing evanescent modes of tunneling are disobeying Einstein’s special theory of relativity too and it’s quite clear there is no coincidence and Einstein’s theory of Special Relativity is safe with the needed correction of adding the weak force asymmetry space gained. Based on the standard of odds against chance science is built on CERN’s findings are correct and the gain in time was caused by the asymmetry of the weak force, and this is what adds the space needed for all the other similar claims made going back to 1947. Science is indeed slow as it waits for the next person of problem solving abilities to come along and take physics to the next level. I’m not waiting for someone to have to tell me what caused CERN’s data because it is now obvious to anyone paying attention to this situation of profound change to the Standard Model.
All put together the undisputable known facts clearly show the neutrino does not exceed the speed of light in adding space/time to the weak force Mass oscillation rate cycle we observe running slightly fast as Stanford’s SLAC’s E158 data shows: it adds it at the speed of light in transferring E as an individual unit of measurement that occupies space and changes force carrier in atomic phase relative to inertial frame based timings as Mass acts as a pendulum generating the weak force from two opposite moment arms of force and direction relative to the oscillation phase of the physical Mass of the observer. This explains the physical based cause of time based on the weight of the Observer fundamental to effects of force we experience through chemistry and neurology to see the World as it is, not freely “imagined” as some mystics think. Our minds may play tricks on us, but time is real and it measures real motion of real objects. Non-relative “real” time is back bringing space with it and a true inertial frame of reference sought after in the “either” before giving up the search. Real time is needed for measuring motion to apply it’s concept to space, reversing the concept of the void of space being applied to time. Einstein had the symmetry of time backwards because he left out a needed part of the clock in relativity: the Observer’s Mass acting as a pendulum. No two observers made out of E can exist at the same exact time allowing time and space to change the view between observers ending many paradoxes.
E.W. Higgs
No time to write but EW said it about as good as I could to keep this simple and the discovery on top of the table.
Hi John, (and others)
I saw your blog regarding CERN's neutrino speed and thought you'd want to know calculations using Stanford's SLAC E158 data on the asymmetry of the weak force were posted by amateur physicist John F. Hendry on Nature's Forum after the CERN September announcement showing each step taken in adding the weak force asymmetry time/space gained in 453.6 miles explaining CERN's v-c/c=2.58e5 neutrino speed. This “added space” is the breakthrough that physics (and Einstein) sorely needed but for Hendry and his friends in the music field the data correlation was not an accidental discovery and the breakthrough happened years ago. Stanford’s SLAC E158 team’s data causing this measurable gain was announced by Hendry years before CERN’s “impossible announcement” and is the reason his response using SLAC’s “unrelated” E158 data was immediate.
The information showing CERN's neutrino v-c/c=2.58e5 @ 453.6 mile gain is a product of weak force asymmetry was posted years ago using SLAC’s E158 data to correct the slight error detected in Newton’s law and went unnoticed outside the music tech community. After CERN’s announcement Mr. Hendry showed the asymmetry value of the weak force applied to E=mc2 (as well as F=ma) which unlike Newton’s Law had no reported error outside of his own claim until CERN showed its effect happening. It’s posted on several other science related forums as well found by Googling "John Hendry neutrino". Mr. Hendry’s claim is also supported by the quantum mechanical behavior of evanescent modes. As you may already know, frustrated total internal reflection (FTIR) using double prisms has clearly revealed quantum mechanical tunneling and “virtual particles” are needed for describing interaction processes where “imaginary” and “not really real” virtual photons predicted by QED calculations are used to fill in the gaps created. This “added space/time” is real and the “imaginary” mathematical placement holding term being used to hold time has been replaced by a real and measurable additional phase in time needed to transfer energy not understood by physics until Real Relativity Theory which the top sound techs had no problem accepting since it “made sense” of time. UFT research grew into DNA research and later resulted in a New Circle of Fifths (while working on the DNA’s gene ensemble’s “circle”) where tonal space is placed relative to time, AND a second phase or direction of time (replacing imaginary time and numbers) relative to Mass oscillation is added to show phase and allow all the sharp and flat notes to fit into the wheel in correct order. This second inertial frame based phase direction towards ‘home’ gives gravity dominance as the initial state force and shows force moving from a higher pressure well to a lower, whereas electron flow is opposite despite common sense with most conventional texts reversing it in the direction of the lower pressure well due to it’s reverse phase direction. Hendry’s E=m+{a}c2 based model is derived from an algebraic particle wave (time) producing clock equation powered by the weak force’s reverse quantum gravity phase separating quantum gravity from cosmological gravity by it’s opposite anti-particle phase and the neutrino’s added space. The equation is built out of known symmetries rearranged by a mechanical function of phase with the needed asymmetry properly placed to transfer E and is exceptionally simple once you realize when Mass oscillates it does the “Moon Dance” to move forward, and due to time dilation the matter in the universe exists in a state of almost frozen time @3.6 seconds a year dilation from looking at Mass in oscillation creating a speed of light clock running slightly fast. It’s initially as controversial as it gets because the UFT equation adds the graviton as a 4th phase/part to the atom and demonstrates that space itself is the force carrier of non-quantum gravity we observe, and Mass is its own force carrier of quantum gravity. When the anti-graviton’s “hole” oscillation phase is active (E returning), the electron’s oscillation (atomic) phase is going up (E doing work and dissipating) with the weak force separated from the strong force by the weak force’s asymmetry neutrino space transferring the photon’s energy at the speed of light adding that tiny distance that adds up with time as shown in other experiments as well.
In 1949 Sommerfeld pointed out that the FTIR tunneling optical phenomenon represents the analogy of quantum mechanical tunneling and in 2007 armed with modern measurements the August New Scientist quoted G. Nimtz and A. A. Stahlhofen as saying that this barrier is crossed in zero time at superluminal tunneling velocity and therefore the evanescent modes of tunneling are disobeying Einstein’s special theory of relativity, or “lie outside the bounds of STR”. They demonstrated this by showing the photons of a light beam crossing the open prisms or “tunnel” did not add the required time needed to cover this “magic” distance at the speed of light. Here, as with CERN’s neutrino speed, we see the laws of relativity again being “broken” without accounting for the weak force asymmetry time gained. Unfortunately you will also see Hendry’s research time and money over the past 12 years has been consumed by a criminal case involving an HOA lawsuit instead of building his home and workshop needed to conduct his own experiments. You can’t hide public records and it’s about time something was done about HOA’s beyond Court gag orders to hide the truth of what goes on with these “legal entities” so hopefully this discovery will draw attention to what stopped the research of the only person to come forward who understands the need and function of the neutrino and the space/time associated with photonic tunneling. The Esaki diode (semiconductor tunnel) has been in use since 1962 but the particle barrier penetration time was not yet determined nor explained outside of “parasitic time consuming electronic interaction effects in a semiconductor”. Now the barrier time is known thanks to SLAC’s E158 team of experts showing in 453.6 miles 2.48e-5 (CERN’s same result) is added to the speed of light with a .20 comma as predicted by Hendry as well as part of Cohan and Glasgow’s VSR theory.
Adding the WFA gain to Mass oscillating at the speed of light (a speed of light clock) reveals constant time dilation as well as asymmetry is added and in effect “at normal walking speed” due to observing the weak force running fast (SOL-SOL=WFASY gain). Hendry is pointing out that we are observing a speed of light clock (creating anti-particle Mass oscillation phase locations) from another frame of reference where our clock has not stopped completely due to the added time. So anti-particle Mass oscillation formation phases are short lived, and the space created is replaced by mass potential energy and the particle wave point space/field created remains permanent building up with time. Isometry, like rests in a music composition, is in effect between observers showing no two observers are simultaneous connecting E to observation by giving the observer Mass. CERN’s neutrino speed is showing we live in a Universe constructed of time dilation where we only observe 3.6 seconds tic by each year. The addition of the neutrino’s space needed to transfer the photons energy has added time to a physical Universe in the direction of the arrow of time with so little movement the trail of an atom’s particle phases (wave) leaves a solid impression shown real by it’s 4 phases of force in phase with the atom’s formation (and the photon), and on the other side/direction of Mass oscillation where quantum gravity’s return reverse arrow cannot grow longer but the clock phase keeps spinning adding gravity a black hole forms with both sides interacting in perpetual interlocking phases of force placing the Observer in the middle feeling the effect. I don’t think the HOA attorneys that robbed Hendry after a 9 year legal battle will obtain the usual silence they expect if SLAC’s E158 data matches CERN’s data because E=m+{a}c2. Surprisingly no one has commented on or disputed Hendry’s addition to mathematics (Einstein’s Comma) on Nature’s forum, certainly the place to do so with CERN workers posting their comments and math to correct CERN’s “error” before Hendry’s announcement, especially since the tiny asymmetry value of the weak force matches CERN’s data against such incredibly high odds of chance and creates a new cosmological constant of obvious effect that Hendry uses to build a model of the 4 Mass oscillating (weak force) particle phases of force creating time as well as holding atoms together, which are not what they appear to be and wave theory explains why.
Unless they decide to try to keep Hendry’s discovery top secret which will be hard to do with the cat out of the bag making so much noise the requirement for the experts needed to announce the shocking data correlation is to not look less informed than an amateur and the wait to catch up and understand the matching data (as well as quantum tunneling) is creating a silence with zero press coverage of the discovery of Hendry’s work that revealed the CERN neutrino/SLAC E158 data relationship. The math is straight forward and Hendry has been citing the cause of the weak force asymmetry and importance of the photon/neutrino energy transfer space using SLAC’s E158 data for years. Fortunately CERN handed Hendry a worldwide press event in physics of the highest caliber of importance based on a simple straight line and known value discrepancy to prove E=m+{a}c2) as well as F=m+{a}a making 2.48e-5 a very important number to remember by its match with SLAC’s E158 data. It’s now probably the most important number in the history of Physics. To grasp this just imagine how far in distance light travels in one thousand years…..now add the relatively small but still vast distance compared to 453.6 miles that light travels in one hour to the thousand year speed of light distance. Now calculate using Hendry’s calculations posted the weak force asymmetry distance gained in 453.6 miles and you have 2.48e-5 showing CERN’s neutrino gain in v is an exact match with Stanford’s SLAC E158 weak force asymmetry t gain creating a .20e-5 harmonic wave comma showing a greater value of 2.68e-5 in the measured asymmetry of a second reverse arrow (anti-graviton phase) of space exactly as Hendry’s theory predicted producing further evidence neutrinos oscillate and Hendry’s claim is correct and accurate. It also supports elements of Cohan and Glasgow’s VSR showing space has a slight measurable asymmetry at this scale just as they claim. Hendry’s addition and confinement of Mass within the weak force connects the Observer to the Universe of forces as a critical part: Mass. Plain and simple, on and off, John Hendry has shown Mass and the point of observation (force) are one and the same on the quantum scale and the weight of Mass, it’s potential energy to oscillate, determines the length of oscillation and explains exactly what time is while exposing the Mass based nature of consciousness and goes far past VSR’s errors.
Due to Stanford's SLAC team's E158 discovery of the weak force asymmetry using a 1000 year speed of light clock measurement to add the one hour asymmetry time gained it has an accuracy advantage over CERN’s data based on only 453.6 miles and places CERN’s data responsible for the final figure responsible for what Hendry named “Einstein’s Comma” in correcting E=mc2. This is not a lose cable as ABC announced recently after Hendry’s data circulated for almost 4 months undisputed by scientists and comments using the math only supported Hendry’s finding. The odds of both CERN and SLAC’s sets of data reaching the same exact "error" in 453.6 miles (2.48e-5) within CERN’s stated limit of error without the direct relationship Hendry pointed out is highly, highly unlikely, and to produce the predicted harmonic oscillation comma correctly shows how accurate both sets of data are and makes it obvious Hendry’s prediction over the years is responsible when you consider he knew exactly what data to use to show cause and effect and we are seeing with neutrinos @ v-c/c=2.48e5 in need of explanation that SLAC’s data matches exactly within CERN’s limit of error.
This relationship stated for years came about by needing the weak force asymmetry value revealed to Hendry by an equation he (and others) claim is the real deal fit on a t-shirt UFT equation of 4 forces working together to create the first atom out of time/energy he posted online years ago before finding SLAC’s E158 data to fill in the needed gap with Google caching saving some of its history. The UFT equation’s track record is impressive if it is answering the biggest question brought forward in physics yet. And this is only one event that has left a track record such as this. Hendry claims (without dispute again and with 100% agreement from those that have seen it awaiting potential patenting issues beyond copyright law) he created a New Circle of Fifths while working on the DNA’s Gene Ensemble’s Summery trying to “cheat” by copying the math over using it. If so that is something impossible to fake as it’s the spine of harmonic music theory. Hendry states assigning tonal space to time made room for all the key signatures to fit and be included in the motion of real time. He says the incomplete original Circle of Fifths worked because it has always relied on the proper Mass oscillation phase cycle of the graviton called the “hole” found opposite the electron in modern books on electricity of imaginary nature except to those in the field that argue which one is moving, the electron or the hole. Stanford’s SLAC E158 team’s data has inadvertently confirmed Hendry’s claims made in the years gone by as well as CERN’s neutrino speed through simple math anyone with a calculator can do revealing the relationship in the three prier unrelated sets of data answering the past questions of quantum tunneling . If Hendry is correct space is the force carrier of gravity. It’s as if the graviton (or “hole” named for a reason) is the spaced formed when you put your finger (the anti-electron’s mass) into clay and create space the size of your finger as you pull it out. No space outside of space is a strange concept till you add time and Mass to see how they go together.
This indeed changes physics by someone who is not a mathematician but in needing to communicate is introducing a new system of mathematics replacing “imaginary time” and the “imaginary” concept used with a second (real) reverse clock phase of Mass oscillation time representing a second reverse arrow of space. The experts seeing Hendry’s posts were silenced claiming CERN in error not expecting such a finding related to the weak force and I think when this gets around the laymen not worried about their “expert” reputation will get it out when Hendry posts the new standard model. I think politics are choking this discovery. Even if it was a coincidence we should have heard something about it when you consider the tremendous distance light travels in a thousand years verse one hour ratio and then section out only 453.6 miles to add the tiny asymmetry value of the weak force to it. At these odds against chance it’s the topic of the Century. Add all the support for Hendry’s correction from 1949 when Sommerfeld pointed out that the FTIR tunneling optical phenomenon represents the analogy of quantum mechanical tunneling to 2007 with G. Nimtz and A. A. Stahlhofen’s data supporting many other measurement claims of the Goos-Hanchen shift that also suggests that tunneling beams travel with superluminal group velocity showing evanescent modes of tunneling are disobeying Einstein’s special theory of relativity too and it’s quite clear there is no coincidence and Einstein’s theory of Special Relativity is safe with the needed correction of adding the weak force asymmetry space gained. Based on the standard of odds against chance science is built on CERN’s findings are correct and the gain in time was caused by the asymmetry of the weak force, and this is what adds the space needed for all the other similar claims made going back to 1947. Science is indeed slow as it waits for the next person of problem solving abilities to come along and take physics to the next level. I’m not waiting for someone to have to tell me what caused CERN’s data because it is now obvious to anyone paying attention to this situation of profound change to the Standard Model.
All put together the undisputable known facts clearly show the neutrino does not exceed the speed of light in adding space/time to the weak force Mass oscillation rate cycle we observe running slightly fast as Stanford’s SLAC’s E158 data shows: it adds it at the speed of light in transferring E as an individual unit of measurement that occupies space and changes force carrier in atomic phase relative to inertial frame based timings as Mass acts as a pendulum generating the weak force from two opposite moment arms of force and direction relative to the oscillation phase of the physical Mass of the observer. This explains the physical based cause of time based on the weight of the Observer fundamental to effects of force we experience through chemistry and neurology to see the World as it is, not freely “imagined” as some mystics think. Our minds may play tricks on us, but time is real and it measures real motion of real objects. Non-relative “real” time is back bringing space with it and a true inertial frame of reference sought after in the “either” before giving up the search. Real time is needed for measuring motion to apply it’s concept to space, reversing the concept of the void of space being applied to time. Einstein had the symmetry of time backwards because he left out a needed part of the clock in relativity: the Observer’s Mass acting as a pendulum. No two observers made out of E can exist at the same exact time allowing time and space to change the view between observers ending many paradoxes.
E.W. Higgs