rationalskepticism.org

Dinox wrote:
So you've never read pages 132 to 135 of Maxlow's Terra Non Firma Earth then? The book where he outlines the evidence in detail and reproduces the charts that indicate large periodic adjustments of the data. One chart near Canberra shows an arbitrary adjustment of 71 mm during 1993 to 1994. This would have resulted in a severe earthquake if it was real. Similar severe adjustments are also noted in a selection of other charts.

I take it you also don't remember my post asking if anyone could explain these adjustments that we can see in the data. The charts are readily available on the web.

lucek answered this much better than I could have hoped to. I'll stick to what I know and that is that no EE proponent (including Maxlow) has done anything other than handwave away the critical objection that there is simply no plausible explanation for where the extra mass comes from.

Furthermore, the known mechanisms for addition of mass to the Earth cannot supply the extra mass and any other mechanism violates 1LoT. Additionally, even if the extra mass was supplied by accretion, as my napkin maths of the previous page demonstrates, it would melt the crust of the Earth - where is the melting?