Posted: Jun 16, 2012 9:45 pm
pfrankinstein wrote:Macroinvertebrate wrote:Have you not noticed, Paul, that nobody thinks your ideas are compelling or profound? You're the only one that thinks so. That alone should clue you in to the fact that you are just regurgitating intellectually vapid nonsense.
Hey, it is not my problem if some/most of the know all members here in this forum lack the ability to think outside of the box.
Open minded intelligent people should have the ability to 'suppose' and 'envisage' new concepts.
Like it or not the 'One bang One process' concept has merit, the movement of 'selection' being self evident.
You yourself macroinvertibrate have yet to pose any logical counter argument to any of my ideas, instead it would seem that you prefer to ignorantly join the two a penny preconditioned thinking crowd.
In the same way that a hand held optical device can be tuned by rotating a wheel to find focus on a sample, the perspective we have of 'evolution' can also differ from different levels. It may have escaped your notice, not only must i explain the 1=1 concept, i must also show and outline those different perspectives.
Do try harder to think, try engaging with your brain before you post/insult me.
Paul.
