Posted: Apr 21, 2014 11:07 am
by kennyc
hackenslash wrote:That's probably because he#s already been comprehensively debunked. Apart from anything else, if Larson were correct about the atom, there would be no photoelectric effect. That the photoelectric effect is demonstrably real, Larson is debunked in toto, and we need not go any further.

The Standard Model is a more complete refutation, but that's not actually required. Larson is a crank, who scores extremely heavily on the Crackpot Index.


:this:

/thread