Posted: May 20, 2010 6:11 pm
by GenesForLife
Right, since you have a medicine degree and not one in science, care to point us to the requisite double blind studies describing and detailing, among other things...

1)The emprical rigour of succussion and dilution in relation to potency.
2) Double blind clinical trials that have shown any kind of statistically significant efficacy (I can cite papers from Lancet which suggests that the field per se is bunkum, and since these are peer reviewed papers with available data supplements, one cannot get away by crying "bias")
3) Double blind studies that indicate an efficacy that is better than conventional medicine (anything worse and homeopathy is tantamount to denial of more efficacious therapy)

Go on, take your pick. I'm looking for proper empirical evidence.