Posted: May 24, 2015 7:11 pm
DavidMcC wrote:I think I read you well enough to know that you are defending White's pseudoscience. His qualification does not eliminate the possibility that he is misusing said qualification in much the same way that Behe misuses his to push creationism.
Really?
lucek wrote:I've read about this and an anomalous signal in a noisy system with no theoretical backing doesn't constitute proof.
Shut up Dave or actually read what has been said.