Posted: May 06, 2016 11:10 am
kano wrote:
Thats because The Mass Energy Paradox is a term you've pulled out of your arse. It isn't used in physics, or found on google, or google scholar.
It all depends on whether you understand the mass-energy equivalence. It takes the LHC and the electrical requirements of a small city (or maybe even a large one) to produce a few trillionths of a nanogram of very-short lived mass-bearing particles at energies of a hundred GeV or so. So don't tell us about pulling things out of our arses, unless you know of a sure-fire way to create enough mass to separate the continents on the surface of a spheroid the size of the earth. The crap that you and the rest of the expanders are spouting is a heavily-disguised creationist screed. The mass-energy paradox is the fact that it is much easier to turn small amounts of matter into large amounts of energy than the reverse, which requires colliding individual subatomic particles at velocities near that of light.
kano wrote:
It was solved in 1931 by Sauter : create an electric field with strength 1.3 E 18 N/C and the field will allow virtual particles to become real, hence free mass-energy from nothing.
What, by harnessing the electrical requirements of a small village to create... What? Continent-sized piles of rubbish the expanders are generating? Yep it takes a village, and there's always a village idiot to go along for the ride.