Posted: May 06, 2016 1:25 pm
Cito di Pense wrote:It all depends on whether you understand the mass-energy equivalence.
No it doesn't.
It takes the LHC and the electrical requirements of a small city (or maybe even a large one) to produce a few trillionths of a nanogram of very-short lived mass-bearing particles at energies of a hundred GeV or so.
So what? the LHC is a piece of junk, designed to waste money and brains. Its results have little significance for growing earth theory.
So don't tell us about pulling things out of our arses, unless you know of a sure-fire way to create enough mass to separate the continents on the surface of a spheroid the size of the earth.
Its fine by me if you lot keep cooking up your own terminologies such as the 'mass energy paradox' to sound smart. But don't cry when I point out you're making it up, likely as you go along.
The crap that you and the rest of the expanders are spouting is a heavily-disguised creationist screed.
The opposite is true. We are bringing the theory of creation into the domain of physics i.e. repeatable under correct conditions, while your lot are crying because you want it to stay in the domain of god, via the big bang in a one off, long distant event that can't be replicated, or directly observed.
Your not above the old criminal mentality of accusing others of your own crimes i see.
The mass-energy paradox is the fact that it is much easier to turn small amounts of matter into large amounts of energy than the reverse, which requires colliding individual subatomic particles at velocities near that of light.
Is that the RS cooked up definition? Or do you have a link to an agreed standard definition by physicists? I don't mind either way.
[/quote]kano wrote:
It was solved in 1931 by Sauter : create an electric field with strength 1.3 E 18 N/C and the field will allow virtual particles to become real, hence free mass-energy from nothing.
What, by harnessing the electrical requirements of a small village to create... What? Continent-sized piles of rubbish the expanders are generating? Yep it takes a village, and there's always a village idiot to go along for the ride.
I see you haven't bothered to look at the description of Sauter's work in the link I provided. You probably won't understand anyway so don't bother.
No, not by harnessing the electrical requirements of a small village. He didn't focus on a practical way of achieving a Sauter limit field. His work was deducing it theoretically via quantum mechanics.