Posted: May 06, 2016 3:48 pm
felltoearth wrote:Number 3 is acceptable is you have a viable theory, which expanding earth proponents don't.
What makes a theory viable or not, and since when did science get obsoleted by the new paradigm of 'viabilism'?
Horseshit as usual. You've got no idea how to judge theories.
Number 4 points to the LHC findings which you have to reckon with one way or another (prove or disprove) in order to have your pet hypothesis gain any traction. That's how science works. Hand waving isn't acceptable science.
Growing Earth theory has absolutely nothing to do with LHC findings. You lot confound some random stuff, no wonder all you can do is follow consensus.