Posted: May 06, 2016 6:54 pm
Creation of energy/matter in a vacuum is a vastly different critter than creating it in the middle of a planet.
... hinting you are speaking from 40 years experience of matter creation engineering in both environments.
Guess what. No one knows, not even you. So when you state it without explanation or reference you betray you are pretending to be an authority in such a transparent and dumb way.
ignoring it then claiming that it wasn't one of the "large part(s)"
Where did I claim it wasn't one of the large parts? Quote me.
If you are running scared from physics theory of creation I don't mind discussing evidence of expansion.
Here's some starter topics :
1. Total failure to find any subduction zone : how all assumed subduction zones are found to be 'locked zones'.
2. similar Fossils and todays species occur on the East Asian coast and the West Americas whithout any migration fossils through Europe.
3. Super continents. Of course on a smaller globe the continents are bound to fit together. On a same size globe PT has to appeal to unknown dynamics, that can be molded to fit data, but cannot be tested.
4. Expansion of other worlds. e.g. Ganymede looks like it has expanded, but cannot have PT.
5. Growing Earth's simple explanation for the strange coincidence of sea levels and land levels being the same to about 0.3% of radius. Conventional theory just flounders to explain it.
6. Larger life 100 million years ago when Earth was smaller and had lower gravity.
Its all in favour of Growing Earth theory.