Posted: Nov 25, 2016 5:19 pm
Kochs postulate are satisfied in every way for HIV.
"21st century " or updates to Kochs postulate are not some NWO bullshit. If it were then why not just consider Kochs original postulates the same? Why are they good but recent advances no good?
It makes no sense to say HIV is not contagious but can be transmitted. How could it be transmitted if it were not contagious? A 1/1000 chance in sexual contact or a 1/2 chance for child birth IS BY DEFINITION A DEMONSTRATION IT IS CONTAGIOUS. Idk how that wasn't clear when I wrote it the first time.
It does not matter if there are latent periods or asymptomatic periods or how long an individual can live. That has no bearing on if Kochs postulates are fulfilled nor on it being non-contagious..
If I weren't on my phone I'd write more but I think those points should be crystal clear right now.
"21st century " or updates to Kochs postulate are not some NWO bullshit. If it were then why not just consider Kochs original postulates the same? Why are they good but recent advances no good?
It makes no sense to say HIV is not contagious but can be transmitted. How could it be transmitted if it were not contagious? A 1/1000 chance in sexual contact or a 1/2 chance for child birth IS BY DEFINITION A DEMONSTRATION IT IS CONTAGIOUS. Idk how that wasn't clear when I wrote it the first time.
It does not matter if there are latent periods or asymptomatic periods or how long an individual can live. That has no bearing on if Kochs postulates are fulfilled nor on it being non-contagious..
If I weren't on my phone I'd write more but I think those points should be crystal clear right now.