Posted: Nov 27, 2016 5:15 pm
chairman bill wrote:Firestarter wrote:The topic here is pseudoscience.
The story the state media has told us about AIDS is pseudoscience because:
1) There has never been any evidence that HIV results in AIDS.
There are a number of auto-immune conditions, some of which look very much like AIDS, so the few people identified as having AIDS but not HIV, does not indicate that HIV doesn't cause AIDS. The vast majority of those identified as having AIDS, have also had previous HIV infection. Lab workers who have had accidents at work resulting in HIV infection, have all gone on to develop AIDS. It is notable that the wives of haemophiliacs who have developed AIDS, have husbands who have been infected with HIV. It is worth noting that there is no other reason for these women to be suffering from immunosuppression. I'd also point out that all of my brother's friends who died of AIDS, and my brother, were HIV+ prior to developing AIDS. HIV infection is the single common feature across all at risk groups who develop AIDS.Besides reading books and articles by AIDS-denialists; I went further. I searched for scientific evidence that proves:
Enough of this fuckwittery. Science does deal in proofs, so when you say you searched for scientific evidence to prove something, you demonstrate that you don't understand science. So someone who doesn't understand science, is here lecturing us on pseudoscience. Talk about brass neck.Vaccination is a perfect way not only to murder children but to test chemical and biological weapons.
The implication that vaccination is being so used, is disgusting.
