Posted: Nov 29, 2016 5:13 pm
Firestarter wrote:
I’ve read some horrible stories about the effects of vaccination.
We've all seen the anecdotes about the extremely isolated effects of vaccination. But, no anti-vaxxer ever bothers to talk about the millions of people who didn't have a horrible experience and simply went on to live their lives free from some truly horrible diseases.
There are far, far, far more horrible stories about the effects of smallpox on people than there are or ever will be about the effects of vaccination.
Firestarter wrote: If I follow this reasoning the objective of mandatory vaccination of the poor kids, is to protect the elite for diseases.
Speaking as one of many poor kids from a poor area with other poor kids who got vaccinated, this is bollocks of the purest sort.
I'm curious as to who the "elites" we might have been mingling with that we were protecting.
As it stands, unvaccinated people are bad for herd immunity. So if there were any unvaccinated "elites" I'm glad they weren't anywhere near me to put the health of kids who couldn't get vaccinations at risk.
Firestarter wrote: Is there information available about what percentage of the rich get vaccinated?
Where would one even get such information? Depending on how your healthcare is funded, the amount of money you have will have no bearing on whether you receive a vaccination or not and consequently no record of your family wealth will be collected.
What we can easily find, however, is the prevalence of diseases that are preventable by vaccinations in populations with limited access to vaccinations or where vaccination uptake has fallen. For example: the increase in measles seen in the UK populations following the media hysteria reporting on the work of that lying cunt Wakefield.
Firestarter wrote: It is known that the elite regularly use drugs and have a promiscuous sexual life.
Is it is known? Unless you can present evidence to support this claim, you don't know any such thing.