Posted: Apr 01, 2017 3:10 am
ginckgo wrote:I still stand by my earlier assessment: Why waste time trying to prove or disprove that there is a mechanism for Earth Expansion, when it has not yet been shown that there even IS expansion?
This cuts both ways: EE proponents mush first solidly show supporting data for any expansion; while opponents can't just think the absence of a mechanism in itself goes all the way in disproving expansion (having said that, any lack in prior plausibility for expansion mechanism certainly raises the bar on the evidence required by EE proponents to support their hypothesis; and it is not up to opponents to falsify EE, it's up to proponents to 'prove' it)
Lets be fair. Let them produce one then work on the other. Doesn't matter which.