Posted: May 06, 2018 6:38 pm
What? 17 is too large for the statistical method?
That's just not true. At all. 17 is a small sample. Samples of a hundred or thousand would be more appropriate for this kind of analysis.
What you're describing is cherry picking and it is profoundly, pathologically un-statistical in nature.
That's just not true. At all. 17 is a small sample. Samples of a hundred or thousand would be more appropriate for this kind of analysis.
What you're describing is cherry picking and it is profoundly, pathologically un-statistical in nature.