Posted: Feb 09, 2019 2:41 pm
by Thommo
bogdan9310 wrote:You are not even trying to see my point. I provided you with proof, and you refuse to see it.

No, you didn't. You provided us with assertions that were completely unfounded, and where checkable, completely untrue.

bogdan9310 wrote:What more can I do?

Explain where you have sourced your material. Engage with constructive disagreement. Acknowledge some of the errors that are plainly present.

bogdan9310 wrote:I get you are not used to doing this, but you have to think.

This is not something you "get", at all. Again, it's not true. What it would be is a convenient and lazy way of dismissing meaningful and important objections.

bogdan9310 wrote:Independent confirmation is the ultimate proof, if you don't want to think, that's not on me.

And conversely if people are happy to think, and you're lazily inventing this as an excuse to dismiss what people actually say, that is on you.