Posted: Apr 28, 2021 11:56 am
by Spearthrower
I mean, there's lots of ideas in there which are definitely not wrong and which are definitely grounded in direct observation... but none of those empirically grounded ideas are his.

The bit which actually is his contribution appears to have fallen down a well of numerology. Assigning significance to numerical values is bad enough, but then demanding that facts conform to assertions arising from numerology contentions is far away from any credible approach.