Posted: Jan 26, 2022 11:32 pm
pfrankinstein wrote:I'm seeing nature sure I am.
We all see nature. That doesn't make you a naturalist.
As it happens, I'm not one, so this is a bit of a derail.
I know dodgy science castles built on narrow faulty restrained logic as a flimsy foundation fall.
I'd be surprised if you didn't at least grasp this notionally. However, your castle fell at the first assault well over a decade ago. It isn't stopping you from doing your impersonation of the Black Knight holding the keep, despite the fact that your castle, its bailey and all the surrounding lands have been occupied by a hostile force known as reality, and that you haven't the supplies to withstand the seige.
Shall we wave our hands aimlessly.
No, we should get on with the business of doing science which, unfortunately, involves discarding your cortical turd as not measuring up to reality and, by virtue of its being a turd, smelling the place up with its stench.
It changed it emerged it developed.
In fact, it evolved, but there was no selection.
It's a mystery how you still don't get this. Stochastic systems evolve. Not all of them have selection as a component of their evolution.
Even the most fuckwitted creationist would have grasped this by now. You don't care whether your idea is right or wrong, it's just a means of staying relevant. You aren't, it isn't, and the scientific world has no use for it, and nor does the forum. If you showed any proclivity for learning, this forum would have been as much of a goldmine to you as it has been to me. I owe the vast majority of my scientific education to the denizens of this little corner of the web, a scientific education some would say is not to be sniffed at. It's why a tiny, unknown, niche blog about science and logic is trundling on toward half a million views in a little over five years.
We can continue to pay lip service to the word EVOLUTION in the large without the penny dropping.
We don't merely pay lip service to it, we've explained in detail and at length why what the universe does is evolve, and why selection is not a factor. Nobody here is not light-years ahead of you.
frankly, your thesis would be exactly as groundbreaking if you asserted that turds exit the rectum with the same viscosity, and exactly as correct. Turds exiting the rectum do not imply specific viscosity any more than evolution implies selection. If you understood either evolution or selection, you might stand a chance of grasping that, but not only do you understand neither, you don't want to. You choose ignorance.