Posted: Nov 14, 2022 1:04 am
pfrankinstein wrote:
Everybody here understands that you are the leading authority on the subject of biological evolution.
No they don't Paul.
Not only do they not, nor do you.
I've told you directly numerous times that this is just contrived bullshit on your part.
I certainly know a shit tonne more than you about it, but that doesn't make me an expert, an authority, or perceived that way by people here.
pfrankinstein wrote:If I look to the core understanding of the subject it is because you have driven me there, you are the man.
Latest suite of lies incoming, I guess.
pfrankinstein wrote:Charles Darwin proposed a single proces...
Bullshit artist.
pfrankinstein wrote: with a mechanism
No, this was explained to you: Darwin hypothesized the mechanism, but knew nothing of the existence of genes, the unit of inheritance. This came later when Mendel's work was rediscovered. Considering the number of years you've been engaged in this pretense of superiority, it's rather telling that you STILL don't know this even after numerous people have explained it to you again and again.
pfrankinstein wrote:and common ancestor
Common ancestor in biology has a meaning Paul. Physical forces are not 'common ancestors'.
pfrankinstein wrote:to explain speciation.... All you.
If you lie about me any more, Paul - then I will ask the moderators to come and oblige you to curtail your lies. Try to keep your incessant lying to just one dollop of steaming bullshit per sentence, eh?
Secondly, as noted, this falsity is all being contrived in the service of attempting to have your flatulent bullshit evade scrutiny by pretending that your ideas are equivalent to Darwin's. This is false - Darwin actually engaged in hard work collecting data, he didn't just repeatedly rub himself about how great he was, or else he'd have been as forgettable as you.