Posted: Jan 15, 2023 4:21 pm
It's not about being wrong that's the problem (I completely agree to this thread being a testament to his ignominy), it's him incessantly lying about what members have written.
He's devoted dozens of posts to just straight up lying about other members - it's a significant part of the last 100 pages.
For example, he can't show a single instance of anything I've written that can be read as me holding the position that evolution isn't a process. Yet he's stated that's my position dozens - literally dozens - of times. I've cited 8 instances of me referring to evolution as a process, so where's the obligation on him to substantiate his strawman?
It's that incessant lying which, even when I've proven the opposite, he simply repeats the lie that has to be taken as trolling. He can both be wrong and not be a lying asshole at the same time.
What's most frustrating is that I think it amounts to unequal treatment - if I acted like this, I know I'd end up with a caution and eventually a warning. How many of my own warnings are from him reporting my posts?
He's devoted dozens of posts to just straight up lying about other members - it's a significant part of the last 100 pages.
For example, he can't show a single instance of anything I've written that can be read as me holding the position that evolution isn't a process. Yet he's stated that's my position dozens - literally dozens - of times. I've cited 8 instances of me referring to evolution as a process, so where's the obligation on him to substantiate his strawman?
It's that incessant lying which, even when I've proven the opposite, he simply repeats the lie that has to be taken as trolling. He can both be wrong and not be a lying asshole at the same time.
What's most frustrating is that I think it amounts to unequal treatment - if I acted like this, I know I'd end up with a caution and eventually a warning. How many of my own warnings are from him reporting my posts?