Posted: Mar 21, 2023 4:04 pm
THWOTH wrote:pfrankinstein wrote:THWOTH wrote:Meh. At this point saying the same thing over and over again in the hope of eliciting a different response is a redundant exercise in self-authentication. You really don't need to validate your philosophy with the agreement of others - and yet you try, try again, and again, and forlornly again. How's that working out for you Paul?
Is it 'fiction philoopy or scienece my theory sir?
But then I broadly divide by "ultimate types" Material enviroment both.
To the rational mind clearly a calculation. A single line of occrence remember.
The prominant factors visulised " totally divided" whist accepting that they blend together and project my reality.
Paul.
O repetition becomes you.
Manifest your desire,
that forlorn truth but a pale wish upon a stale breeze,
stirring no leaf upon Life's tree,
yet rotting all fruit upon its bows.
Be that Apple fermenting.-
Thinking. ,..
Does the conception slowly dawn only time will tell. Of anything.
Yay. A battle of perceptions.
How do you perceive the article, The sample, .Reality.
Did you dig in the dirt to find the answer.
Archology well tested.
By projection A one size fits all "type answer mine.
Try to envisage anything that is not "evolving.
Paul.