Posted: Jun 20, 2010 8:48 pm
Dr. Nancy Malik wrote:The problem isn’t with the use of anecdotal evidence. It’s with the double standard applied by the conventional regulatory establishment that holds complementary & alternative medicine to an absurdly higher standard. If informed anecdotal evidence is allowable for 85% of all medical procedure and drug usage, why is alternative health held to an impossible 0% standard?
Maybe because that's just another fantasy "fact" you've extracted from you posterior.
And once a treatment has been unequivocally determined to be ineffective, as homeopathy has been, then it is dropped. To present it as an effective option to a patient becomes malpractice. Unless, of course, you call yourself a "homeopath".