Posted: Jun 28, 2010 11:14 am
by tnjrp
Based on what I've understood and read about Pitkänen indicates he's made up a mathematically consistent model of the world that unfortunately (given the effort) appears to have a rather tenous, possibly incidental relationship with our observable reality*.

In other words, TGd's rather much ado about practically nothing.

But I'm not a mathematigian so I accept the possibility I could be wrong on one or both counts.


*) This tenousness including but not limited to his fascination with such commonly-seen-as-wooberish stuff as crop circles (which definitely are neither woo nor yet pedestrian hoaxes, according to Pitkänen)