Posted: Nov 16, 2010 12:16 am
by darwin2
trubble76 wrote:
darwin2 wrote:
trubble76 wrote:

Oh, it's the "well you can't disprove it." argument. It's been done to death a million times. For someone that professes to know about science, I'm surprised that you have been caught out by it. Science does not brainwash, it can't. It wouldn't be science if it washed any brains. Religion on the other hand, is quite well known for it's brainwashing. This too is fairly obvious, but again, it seems to have exposed you.
When you have sought the meaning and consequences of peer-review, you will then see that delusion is not something that taints science as readily as it permeates religion.
Your post is just mudslinging, you are just trotting out old, childish arguments and somehow expect us to be impressed by them, and you called those that require evidence deluded. I think jebus had something to say about planks in eyes that is relevant.


I never stated that those who require evidence are deluded. I did state those who say it is impossible for consciousness to continue after death are deluded.


I have highlighted the things you said that you seem to have forgotten about.


I have no idea what you are talking about. Please clarify.