Posted: Mar 10, 2011 12:38 pm
harleyborgais wrote:Finally, an intelligent response...
Oh dear. If the others here aren't giving you much time of day, it isn't because I'm the most intelligent person here. Rather, you have got bad enough logic that even I can see through it.
By sennekuyl:
It isn't difficult. There is a button called Quote; press it on the post you wish to reply to and it inserts automagically into your reply box
- Code: Select all
[quote]<post you respond to here>[/quote]
and it put it in these nice boxes. If you want to give credit where due, put an equal sign inside the first set of quote boxes, after the word quote. Like this
- Code: Select all
[quote="sennekuyl"]says shit[/quote]
and you get this really nice box:
- Code: Select all
[quote="harleyborgais"]Finally, an intelligent response...[/quote]
becomes
harleyborgais wrote:Finally, an intelligent response...
There are even buttons to preview what you have said. (Psst: it is at the bottom of the reply box)
Here is this entire post so you can see how it works.
- Code: Select all
[quote="harleyborgais";p="754245"]Finally, an intelligent response...[/quote]
Oh dear. If the others here aren't giving you much time of day, it isn't because I'm the most intelligent person here. Rather, you have got bad enough logic that even I can see through it.
[quote]By sennekuyl:[/quote]
It isn't difficult. There is a button called Quote; press it on the post you wish to reply to and it inserts [i]automagically into your reply box[/i]
[code]
[quote]<post you respond to here>[/quote]
[/code]
and it put it in these nice boxes. If you want to give credit where due, put an equal sign inside the first set of quote boxes, after the word quote. Like this
[code]
[quote="sennekuyl"]says shit[/quote]
[/code]
and you get this really nice box:
[code]
[quote="harleyborgais"]Finally, an intelligent response...[/quote]
[/code]
becomes
[quote="harleyborgais";p="754245"]Finally, an intelligent response...[/quote]
There are even buttons to preview what you have said. (Psst: it is at the bottom of the reply box)
Here is this entire post so you can see how it works.
[code]
Oh not again :mad:
[/code]
Yeah, me again :roll:
[quote="sennekuyl";p="754245"]"you figured out the universe WITHOUT EQUATIONS!!)" [/quote]
[quote="harleyborgais";p="754245"]The reason Pi is a never ending number with no pattern is because there is always an indivisible remainder after every math operation when you try to compute the area between a curve and a line. Pi is the ratio between the Circumference and Diameter of circle. Because of this, you can only use ratios, not exact calculations, to comprehend the relationships between straight-line forces like attraction and repulsion, and the curved forces like centripetal force, centrifugal force, spin, etc. All growth and decay rates are curved functions over time (the straight line). This is why Geometry is more useful for understanding reality than math, and why the most sacred and ancient geometric figures, exactly model physical atoms and the lattice structures which give matter form.[/quote]
But geometry is a subset of maths. Nice shapes is good and all, but it/they tells us nothing without being measured and correlated.
[quote="sennekuyl";p="754245"]"black holes are the result of normal matter (a supermassive star) collapsing on itself due to the mass of the star ?curving space?"[/quote]
[quote]Is that a question or a statement?
Sure, black holes are normal matter collapsed, that is what I described more specifically above.[/quote]
I was acknowledging my statement was fuzzy.
[quote]
[quote]
"I have it from extremely reliable sources such as AIG that Dark Matter is a fudge to explain the missing mass of the universe."[/quote]
I agree. But the fact is that there IS matter we cannot see, creating strong gravity fields, bending light, making stars move faster, etc. It is matter, it is dark, and there is more of IT, then of visible matter. This is all factual. Why not call it dark matter? The point is we cant see it.[/quote]
I'll spell it out. Answers In Genesis.
Okay. how do we go from "matter we can't see" to equivocation with black holes? The properties are different.
[quote]
[quote]"To my knowledge Dark Matter is only slightly better defined (it has a number) than the entity commonly called "God"."[/quote]
The First Event is explained in "The Genesis of Relativity" and "How We Exist" at freeornottobe.org. It is a reaction of equal and opposite forces (or pressure in motion), at 90-degrees, which caused spin, which started a chain reaction, which led to all we see, according to the pattern called the Flower of Life, as seen in the photo of atoms. Consciousness came before matter, logically (once you understand what consciousness essentially is), and so God was the first consciousness, and thought the same as we do, because we are created equally in the image of Gods mind.[/quote]
You've just jumped to a conclusion without giving a basis.
Yeah, me again
sennekuyl wrote:"you figured out the universe WITHOUT EQUATIONS!!)"
harleyborgais wrote:The reason Pi is a never ending number with no pattern is because there is always an indivisible remainder after every math operation when you try to compute the area between a curve and a line. Pi is the ratio between the Circumference and Diameter of circle. Because of this, you can only use ratios, not exact calculations, to comprehend the relationships between straight-line forces like attraction and repulsion, and the curved forces like centripetal force, centrifugal force, spin, etc. All growth and decay rates are curved functions over time (the straight line). This is why Geometry is more useful for understanding reality than math, and why the most sacred and ancient geometric figures, exactly model physical atoms and the lattice structures which give matter form.
But geometry is a subset of maths. Nice shapes is good and all, but it/they tells us nothing without being measured and correlated.
sennekuyl wrote:"black holes are the result of normal matter (a supermassive star) collapsing on itself due to the mass of the star ?curving space?"
Is that a question or a statement?
Sure, black holes are normal matter collapsed, that is what I described more specifically above.
I was acknowledging my statement was fuzzy.
"I have it from extremely reliable sources such as AIG that Dark Matter is a fudge to explain the missing mass of the universe."
I agree. But the fact is that there IS matter we cannot see, creating strong gravity fields, bending light, making stars move faster, etc. It is matter, it is dark, and there is more of IT, then of visible matter. This is all factual. Why not call it dark matter? The point is we cant see it.
I'll spell it out. Answers In Genesis.
Okay. how do we go from "matter we can't see" to equivocation with black holes? The properties are different.
"To my knowledge Dark Matter is only slightly better defined (it has a number) than the entity commonly called "God"."
The First Event is explained in "The Genesis of Relativity" and "How We Exist" at freeornottobe.org. It is a reaction of equal and opposite forces (or pressure in motion), at 90-degrees, which caused spin, which started a chain reaction, which led to all we see, according to the pattern called the Flower of Life, as seen in the photo of atoms. Consciousness came before matter, logically (once you understand what consciousness essentially is), and so God was the first consciousness, and thought the same as we do, because we are created equally in the image of Gods mind.
You've just jumped to a conclusion without giving a basis.