Posted: Apr 03, 2011 3:43 pm
Lovely, Paul.
What you're being told here is that all you've done is show up with some vomitus from your imagination. I asked you to define your terms to clarify your OP, your responded with a smartass answer. You don't even have what would qualify as a hypothesis. Later, I asked you to describe how you tested this hypothesis. Nothing from you on that but static.
What do you really want? Are you first expecting someone to tell you how fucking brilliant your idea is before you submit your "innovation" for destruction? You ought to know by now, if your "innovation" won't survive examination here, you have no hope of it being accepted as science in any real peer review.
What you're being told here is that all you've done is show up with some vomitus from your imagination. I asked you to define your terms to clarify your OP, your responded with a smartass answer. You don't even have what would qualify as a hypothesis. Later, I asked you to describe how you tested this hypothesis. Nothing from you on that but static.
What do you really want? Are you first expecting someone to tell you how fucking brilliant your idea is before you submit your "innovation" for destruction? You ought to know by now, if your "innovation" won't survive examination here, you have no hope of it being accepted as science in any real peer review.