Posted: Apr 04, 2011 12:47 pm
pfrankinstein wrote:Mr.Samsa wrote:
For example, you suggest that the big bang can be understood in evolutionary terms, yet I'm unsure how the "change in allele frequencies in a population" applies to expansion of space and time.
What a pathetic notion, in looking for your earliest biological common ancestor under the microscope, would you expect to see a mini you ape lookalike staring back at you. lol. You make the silly mistake of holding up the Darwinian/biological process as the leading example of what "evolution" actually is. If, as i contend the big bang started a primordial process of evolution and the Darwinian process emerged from that, then would you expect that primordial process to parrot the biological process exactly?
The laws of physics samsa, the first type of selection before natural selection?
Bang > Primal selection Non-conscious . > Unconscious Subconscious Natural selection. > Do you understand cognition?
Paul. >>>
You are still making shit up; and unless you stop replying with nothing but arrogant, snide remarks, accompanied by more pseudo-scientific wibble, but start to provide some actual substance, that is, evidence and proper research, that won't change.
To claim that there are evolutionary processes at work ever since the big bang is easy, but can you actually substantiate your claim? I very much doubt it.