Posted: Jan 31, 2013 4:30 pm
We can read a lot of researches online, whit statistically significant results. Why these results aren`t accepted? There are a lot of 40%+ Ganzfield results (25% by chance), and not too much negative.
SO what is the truth?
I have a single question:The significant results are "accustomed, regular ", frequent results, or they are rare, in very small ammount, and for this, if we unite every research, we will not find results bigger than chance?
SO what is the truth?
I have a single question:The significant results are "accustomed, regular ", frequent results, or they are rare, in very small ammount, and for this, if we unite every research, we will not find results bigger than chance?