Posted: Feb 06, 2013 8:46 am
Hello, Transilvanian,
you ask for a list of unsuccessful ganzfeld trials. Luckily, I'm able to put that together without too much bother, if you don't mind the cut and paste. The data below is Author; Title; Year; Number of trials; Hit rate in percent (as a decimal).
While these, by themselves, are not proof that ESP does not exist, it should give a better idea of the data as a whole. Hope this helps.
(EDIT: I just noticed that not all of these are ones with a chance hit rate of 25%. Some have different levels expected by chance, for example 50%.)
Bem, Honorton; PRL Novice 1; 1989; 50; 0.24
Bierman ; Anomolous information access in the GF 2; 1993; 50; 0.24
Bierman ; Anomolous information access in the GF 1; 1993; 50; 0.26
Blackmore; Extrasensory perception…; 1980; 36; 0.25
Bosga, Gerding, Wezelman; Target affinity; 1994; 50; 0.20
Braud, Wood; The influence of immediate feedback on free-response -GESP performance during ganzfeld stimulation; 1977; 60; 0.45
Broughton, Alexander; clairvoyance series; 1997; 50; 0.22
Broughton, Alexander; first timers I; 1997; 50; 0.24
Broughton, Alexander; first timers II; 1997; 50; 0.18
Child, Levi; Psi missing again; 1980; 17; 0.06
Child; Psi missing in free response settings ; 1979; 14; 0.00
Colyer; Imagery in the Ganzfeld; 2001; 40; 0.23
Delanoy; An examination of subject and agent mentation in the ganzfeld; 1988; 40; 0.25
Delanoy; The training of psi; 1982; 72; 0.15
di Tullio, Gimeno; Experimento di Ganzfeld; 2000; 60; 0.20
Habel; Varying auditory stimuli; 1976; 90; 0.49
Haraldsson; Perceptual defensiveness, GF; 1985; 38; 0.26
Houtkooper ; Why the GF is conducive to ESP; 1988; 40; 0.25
Howard, Delgado; Finding and correcting flaws; 2005; 52; 0.13
Iannuzzo; Esperimenti Ganzfeld series 3; 1984; 24; 0.00
Iannuzzo; Esperimenti Ganzfeld series 4; 1984; 24; 0.04
Iannuzzo; Esperimenti Ganzfeld series 5; 1984; 24; 0.00
Iannuzzo; Esperimenti Ganzfeld series 6; 1984; 32; 0.06
Iannuzzo; Esperimenti Ganzfeld series 7; 1984; 35; 0.00
Johansson, Parker; study 1; 1997; 30; 0.20
Kanthamani & Palmer; A Ganzfeld Experiment With "Subliminal Sending".; 1993; 22; 0.09
Kanthamani et al; series 5; 1994; 14; 0.14
Kanthamani, Broughton; Series 1 (aka Munson et al 1988); 1995; 31; 0.19
Kanthamani, Broughton; series 3; 1994; 40; 0.20
Kanthamani, Broughton; series 7; 1994; 50; 0.26
Kanthamani, Broughton; series 8; 1994; 46; 0.26
Keane, Wells; An examination of the menstrual cycle ; 1979; 54; 0.14
Milton ; The effect of agent strategies; 1984; 20; 0.25
Morris et al; Towards replication and extension of autoganzfeld results Study 1; 1993; 32; 0.25
Palmer, Aued; An ESP test with pyschometric; 1975; 40; 0.16
Palmer, Bogart, Jones, Tart; Scoring Patterns in an ESP GF experiment ; 1977; 30; 0.23
Palmer, Khamashta, Israelson; An ESP GF experiment with transcendental; 1979; 20; 0.10
Palmer, Leibermann; The influence of psychological ; 1975; 40; 0.25
Palmer, Whitson, Bogart; Ganzfeld and Remote Viewing; 1980; 20; 0.24
Palmer; ESP and Out-of-Body Experiences: EEG Correlates; 1978; 20; 0.27
Parker, Miller, Beloff; Three experimenter ganzfeld; 1977; 72; 0.50
Parker, Sjoden; The subliminal priming of film clips; 2008; 58; 0.21
Parker, Westerlund; Serial study; 1998; 30; 0.23
Parker; Some findings relevant to the change of state hypothesis; 1975; 30; 0.20
Roe, Ali, McKenzie; Sender and receiver creativity scores as predictors of performance ; 2001; 24; 0.21
Roe, Sherwood, Holt; Interpersonal psi: Exploring the role of the sender in Ganzfeld GESP tasks; 2003; 40; 0.25
Rogo; A preliminary study; 1977; 200; 0.44
Sherman, Trost, Bem; Cornell: non-meditators; 1995; 25; 0.12
Sherwood, Roe, Holt, Simmonds; Interpersonal psi: Exploring the role of the experimenter in Ganzfeld GESP tasks; 2004; 38; 0.21
Simmonds, Fox, Holt; Schizotypy, Creativity and Psi Performance in a Visual Noise Paradigm; 2002; 20; 0.10
Simmonds-More, Holt; Trait, State and Psi; 2007; 26; 0.23
Smith, Fox, Williams; Developing a digital autoganzfeld testing system; 2000; 55; 0.24
Sondow; Exploring Hypnotizability; 1987; 60; 0.20
Stanford, Frank; Prediction of ganzfeld ESP-task performance from session-based verbal indicators; 1991; 58; 0.19
Stanford, Kass, Kulter; Session based verbal predictors; 1989; 56; 0.25
Stanford, Neylon; Experiential factors related to free-response clairvoyance performance in a sensory uniformity setting (ganzfeld).; 1975; 40; 0.20
Stanford; The influence of auditory ganzfeld characteristics upon free-response ESP performance; 1979; 80; 0.25
Stevens; Testing a model for dyadic esp – false feedback; 2003; 50; 0.26
Stevens; Testing a model for dyadic esp; 2003; 50; 0.26
Vitulli; Colour-mediated ganzfeld; 1985; 80; 0.25
Westerlund, Parker, Dalkvist, Goulding ; Digital Ganzfeld; 2004; 128; 0.23
Wezelman, Bierman; Judging Procedure and Altered States of Consciousness: series 5; 1997; 20; 0.10
Wezelman, Bierman; series 6 meditators; 1997; 7; 0.14
Wezelman, Bierman; series 6 non cannabis; 1997; 20; 0.20
Wezelman; Psi-experimenten met psilocybine; 1998; 40; 0.23
Williams, Roe, Upchurch, Lawrence; Senders and Geomagnetism in the Auto-Ganzfeld; 1994; 42; 0.12
Willin; A Ganzfeld Experiment using musical targets; 1996; 100; 0.24
Willin; Ganzfeld study with music 2; 1996; 16; 0.25
Wiseman; The World's Largest ESP Experiment Ever; 2000; 11; 0.27
Wood, Kirk , Braud; Free response GESP performance ; 1977; 48; 0.21
Zingrone, Hansen, Perlstrom; Series 1 and 2 of a ganzfeld pilot study; 1983; 50; 0.22
you ask for a list of unsuccessful ganzfeld trials. Luckily, I'm able to put that together without too much bother, if you don't mind the cut and paste. The data below is Author; Title; Year; Number of trials; Hit rate in percent (as a decimal).
While these, by themselves, are not proof that ESP does not exist, it should give a better idea of the data as a whole. Hope this helps.
(EDIT: I just noticed that not all of these are ones with a chance hit rate of 25%. Some have different levels expected by chance, for example 50%.)
Bem, Honorton; PRL Novice 1; 1989; 50; 0.24
Bierman ; Anomolous information access in the GF 2; 1993; 50; 0.24
Bierman ; Anomolous information access in the GF 1; 1993; 50; 0.26
Blackmore; Extrasensory perception…; 1980; 36; 0.25
Bosga, Gerding, Wezelman; Target affinity; 1994; 50; 0.20
Braud, Wood; The influence of immediate feedback on free-response -GESP performance during ganzfeld stimulation; 1977; 60; 0.45
Broughton, Alexander; clairvoyance series; 1997; 50; 0.22
Broughton, Alexander; first timers I; 1997; 50; 0.24
Broughton, Alexander; first timers II; 1997; 50; 0.18
Child, Levi; Psi missing again; 1980; 17; 0.06
Child; Psi missing in free response settings ; 1979; 14; 0.00
Colyer; Imagery in the Ganzfeld; 2001; 40; 0.23
Delanoy; An examination of subject and agent mentation in the ganzfeld; 1988; 40; 0.25
Delanoy; The training of psi; 1982; 72; 0.15
di Tullio, Gimeno; Experimento di Ganzfeld; 2000; 60; 0.20
Habel; Varying auditory stimuli; 1976; 90; 0.49
Haraldsson; Perceptual defensiveness, GF; 1985; 38; 0.26
Houtkooper ; Why the GF is conducive to ESP; 1988; 40; 0.25
Howard, Delgado; Finding and correcting flaws; 2005; 52; 0.13
Iannuzzo; Esperimenti Ganzfeld series 3; 1984; 24; 0.00
Iannuzzo; Esperimenti Ganzfeld series 4; 1984; 24; 0.04
Iannuzzo; Esperimenti Ganzfeld series 5; 1984; 24; 0.00
Iannuzzo; Esperimenti Ganzfeld series 6; 1984; 32; 0.06
Iannuzzo; Esperimenti Ganzfeld series 7; 1984; 35; 0.00
Johansson, Parker; study 1; 1997; 30; 0.20
Kanthamani & Palmer; A Ganzfeld Experiment With "Subliminal Sending".; 1993; 22; 0.09
Kanthamani et al; series 5; 1994; 14; 0.14
Kanthamani, Broughton; Series 1 (aka Munson et al 1988); 1995; 31; 0.19
Kanthamani, Broughton; series 3; 1994; 40; 0.20
Kanthamani, Broughton; series 7; 1994; 50; 0.26
Kanthamani, Broughton; series 8; 1994; 46; 0.26
Keane, Wells; An examination of the menstrual cycle ; 1979; 54; 0.14
Milton ; The effect of agent strategies; 1984; 20; 0.25
Morris et al; Towards replication and extension of autoganzfeld results Study 1; 1993; 32; 0.25
Palmer, Aued; An ESP test with pyschometric; 1975; 40; 0.16
Palmer, Bogart, Jones, Tart; Scoring Patterns in an ESP GF experiment ; 1977; 30; 0.23
Palmer, Khamashta, Israelson; An ESP GF experiment with transcendental; 1979; 20; 0.10
Palmer, Leibermann; The influence of psychological ; 1975; 40; 0.25
Palmer, Whitson, Bogart; Ganzfeld and Remote Viewing; 1980; 20; 0.24
Palmer; ESP and Out-of-Body Experiences: EEG Correlates; 1978; 20; 0.27
Parker, Miller, Beloff; Three experimenter ganzfeld; 1977; 72; 0.50
Parker, Sjoden; The subliminal priming of film clips; 2008; 58; 0.21
Parker, Westerlund; Serial study; 1998; 30; 0.23
Parker; Some findings relevant to the change of state hypothesis; 1975; 30; 0.20
Roe, Ali, McKenzie; Sender and receiver creativity scores as predictors of performance ; 2001; 24; 0.21
Roe, Sherwood, Holt; Interpersonal psi: Exploring the role of the sender in Ganzfeld GESP tasks; 2003; 40; 0.25
Rogo; A preliminary study; 1977; 200; 0.44
Sherman, Trost, Bem; Cornell: non-meditators; 1995; 25; 0.12
Sherwood, Roe, Holt, Simmonds; Interpersonal psi: Exploring the role of the experimenter in Ganzfeld GESP tasks; 2004; 38; 0.21
Simmonds, Fox, Holt; Schizotypy, Creativity and Psi Performance in a Visual Noise Paradigm; 2002; 20; 0.10
Simmonds-More, Holt; Trait, State and Psi; 2007; 26; 0.23
Smith, Fox, Williams; Developing a digital autoganzfeld testing system; 2000; 55; 0.24
Sondow; Exploring Hypnotizability; 1987; 60; 0.20
Stanford, Frank; Prediction of ganzfeld ESP-task performance from session-based verbal indicators; 1991; 58; 0.19
Stanford, Kass, Kulter; Session based verbal predictors; 1989; 56; 0.25
Stanford, Neylon; Experiential factors related to free-response clairvoyance performance in a sensory uniformity setting (ganzfeld).; 1975; 40; 0.20
Stanford; The influence of auditory ganzfeld characteristics upon free-response ESP performance; 1979; 80; 0.25
Stevens; Testing a model for dyadic esp – false feedback; 2003; 50; 0.26
Stevens; Testing a model for dyadic esp; 2003; 50; 0.26
Vitulli; Colour-mediated ganzfeld; 1985; 80; 0.25
Westerlund, Parker, Dalkvist, Goulding ; Digital Ganzfeld; 2004; 128; 0.23
Wezelman, Bierman; Judging Procedure and Altered States of Consciousness: series 5; 1997; 20; 0.10
Wezelman, Bierman; series 6 meditators; 1997; 7; 0.14
Wezelman, Bierman; series 6 non cannabis; 1997; 20; 0.20
Wezelman; Psi-experimenten met psilocybine; 1998; 40; 0.23
Williams, Roe, Upchurch, Lawrence; Senders and Geomagnetism in the Auto-Ganzfeld; 1994; 42; 0.12
Willin; A Ganzfeld Experiment using musical targets; 1996; 100; 0.24
Willin; Ganzfeld study with music 2; 1996; 16; 0.25
Wiseman; The World's Largest ESP Experiment Ever; 2000; 11; 0.27
Wood, Kirk , Braud; Free response GESP performance ; 1977; 48; 0.21
Zingrone, Hansen, Perlstrom; Series 1 and 2 of a ganzfeld pilot study; 1983; 50; 0.22