Posted: Apr 01, 2016 1:04 pm
tuco wrote:Cito di Pense wrote:tuco wrote:You are fucking crying that I derail thread about nonsense.
I agree, tuco, that was a fucking mistake. Those who know how to do it properly simply ignore your posts, as happened in this thread, where you were even commenting more or less on topic:
http://www.rationalskepticism.org/islam ... l#p2396919
I'll remember to do that next time. Sorry for the irritation.
In a time when the so-called migrant crisis, Islam, Islamic radicalism threatens foundations of the EU, threatens ignorant people through assholes with cool haircuts and without, someone starts a thread where there is at least remote chance to learn something positive about Islam, unlike the usual how Islam is not religion of peace, how veil is oppression of women even those who want to wear it or what some fucked up imam somewhere said. And you compare it to this thread, to this nonsense. Nonsense no serious researcher spends time and energy on.
No irritation or rather irritation well worth. This tells me more than your eloquent posts about nothing.
Glad you could get that off your chest, whatever it was. There's a reason nobody knows how to respond to what you think you're saying. It's because, no matter how hard you try, you can't say it. As somebody else has pointed out to you, problems with syntax and grammar should not prevent you from making yourself plain. You don't have a clue what it is you want to say, beyond your repeated insistence that numerology of scripture is not important compared to European politics. Each to his own, tuco.
You're also not managing to read irony, except that I sincerely AM sorry to irritate you, because your inarticulateness is only your most obvious problem. It's pointless to respond to your posts because you're all broadcast and no reception, and that has little to do with your difficulties in a second language, especially given the prior observation that reading is easier than writing in a second language.