rationalskepticism.org

GrahamH wrote:

Cito di Pense wrote:

GrahamH wrote:
Where is the evidence of "non-physical mind"?

I think you're jumping the gun. I merely asked why we'd consider it evidence of a non-physical mind in the first place. Parsimony begs us to consider it the work of physical minds.

That is my point, repeated many times now. Even if we take this absurd numerology to be evidence of minds communicating it fails entirely to show those minds to be non-physical, or gods. any number of less fanciful notions of physical minds can be imagined.

Well, it needs to be repeated. So let's do it again. Belief in God presupposes that God exists, and attempts to prove God using 'evidence' (instead of Thomist arguments, for example, but let's not go there) are mostly attempted by johnny-come-lately types who succumb to theism on whatever excuse, later in life, after they learned to think.